THE INSTITUTE OF EUROPE
The Institute of Europe of the
Russian Academy of Sciences (IE RAS) is the authoritative and
influential think tank in Russia. Founded in 1987 with the aim of providing
scientific understanding and explanation of the dramatic changes in Europe
and their prospects, the Institute works on economic, political, social and
security issues, established or emerging across Europe.
Apart from academic and research
work, the Institute is producing expert opinion for a wide range of
organizations and bodies in the Russian Federation, including ministries,
the government and the Presidential administration. It is well-known among
political scientists around the world. In 2007 the Institute of Europe was
ranked among the leading think tanks in Russia and the CEE countries by the
Foreign Policy Research Institute (Philadelphia, USA).
As of November 2009, there are 81
staff employees, including 3 Academicians, and 3 Corresponding Members of
the Russian Academy of Sciences and 20 Doctors. Besides the Institute
employs researchers from other organizations for numerous projects.
The Institute of Europe is committed
to gender equality. Today, there are 31 male and 26 female researchers
working in the Institute.
Two Academic Boards have the
authority to award degrees in Economics, History, and Political Science.
Post-graduate students in the Institute focus their researches on
discovering solutions which can assist the EU, Russia and the CIS countries
in tackling existing or potential internal and external challenges.
The Institute is run by the
Scholarly Council and the Director's Board, which collectively define the
key spheres of research. The Scholarly Council consists of the members of
the Director's Board, Heads of Departments and leading specialists of the
Institute and other associated organizations.
Since 1999 the Director of the
Institute is Academician Nikolai Shmelev.
FROM THE HISTORY OF THE INSTITUTE OF EUROPE
Academician Vitaly Zhurkin
THE INSTITUTE OF EUROPE
(RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES).
THE MAIN SCIENTIFIC TRENDS
The Institute of Europe (IE) is the
youngest among interdisciplinary academic centers, which were created for
studying the main economic and geopolitical regions of the planet, relations
between them and our country, analysis of its interests all over the world.
All these institutes combine fundamental scientific research with elaborate
practical conclusions and recommendations. The algorithm of the IE’s
activity, which was begun in the end of 1987 – start of 1988, is the same.
The research of Europe was always a
priority part of the Russian scientific and cultural tradition. It was
conducted as before historical disputes of "Westerners" and "Slavophiles",
as after them. The Russian science, culture, art were and remain the
integral elements of the western civilization. However in Soviet times
caused by irony, or speaking exactly by virtue of party and bureaucratic
cobwebs, the European direction remained long time shattered and divided
between various groups of researchers of international relations. Only with
the beginning of perestroika and the sharp increase of interest to Europe
and to the European experience the Institute of Europe was established in
the Academy of Sciences.
The Institute was created to carry on the
analysis of a number of major problems: first, economic, political, social,
military and other processes in modern Europe; second, development of the
European integration first of all in the field of economy – "the first
pillar" of the European Community (the European Union – EU), and later two
other "pillars" of the EU – common foreign and security policy, and also
home policy and justice; third, place and role of Europe in modern world and
probable new tendencies in 21st century; fourth, systems of relations
between Russia and the largest countries of Europe, the EU, regions of
Europe; fifth, the European direction of foreign policy of our state.
The first question which has risen for the
small initiative group (it included at the beginning the writer of these
lines, deputy director, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of
Sciences Vladimir Shenaev and the head of department, soon becoming another
deputy director, doctor of history Sergei Karaganov) was the following: what
should be the major principle on which the Institute to be based? The
variety of different variants was reduced to the alternative: whether to
form the Institute on the geopolitical and geoeconomic model, to create
departments of Germany, France, Britain, Scandinavia, paying less attention
to the all-European problems or to form the research process around the
large all-European programs, above all problems of European integration and
security. Then intensive studying of the states and regions of Europe would
be postponed for the future.
In thorough discussions many scientists
have taken part. Among them were the present director of the IE, academician
Nicolai Shmelev, the permanent head of integration studies, doctor of
economics, professor Yury Borko, some of the oldest researches of the IE,
doctor of history, professor Nicolai Kovalsky and doctor of economics,
professor Valentin Kudrov; the first representatives of scientific youth who
nowadays head departments, centers and sectors candidate of economics
Vladislav Belov, candidate of economics Olga Butorina, candidate of
economics Dmitry Danilov, doctor of economics Vadim Tsirenshchikov and other
scientists. As a result almost all of them have preferred the second model
of the IE’s construction. So the expansion of the Institute was carried out
so to say by two "waves". And such approach was justified. On this way the
Institute has found itself as the valuable scientific organization, has
occupied a modest, but a worthy place in the academic system. Certainly,
various spheres of its activity were developed unequally. Serious problems
arose with gathering the scientific staff. Finally during five-six years
about ten scientific directions were developed. And now they are determining
the IE’s face in many respects.
The interdisciplinary group of researchers
of process of the European integration was formed especially fast. Giving
due respect to specialists in European integration in other academic centers
and universities (as well as in general to all experts on Europe), it is
valid to say that exactly the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of
Sciences became the main Russian research center of processes of European
integration in all its aspects.
The department, and now the Center for
European Integration Studies, exists in the Institute from the time of
creation, and doctor of economics Yury Borko has been heading it almost from
the beginning. He is one of the experts from the older generation who have
begun studying integration processes in Europe as far back as 1960s. It is
necessary to emphasize, that besides the above mentioned department various
aspects of the European integration are analyzed in other divisions and
subdivisions studying problems of European security, regional cooperation in
Europe, informatization in a modern society, the European economics.
Academician Nicolai Shmelev and corresponding member Vladimir Shenaev have
been working on these questions a lot. The latter has been engaging in the
problems of the European integration for a long time, since 1960s. In 1993
he has published the monograph "Economy of the Western Europe". Nicolai
Shmelev has thoroughly studied problems of integration as well.
Eight major themes are in the center of
attention of the experts, working in this area: economic integration,
political integration, the EU as a new type of the international
organization, territorial expansion of the European integration, the EU and
the external world, mutual relations between Russia and the EU, the European
integration and the Western civilization, regional integration and
globalization at the end of the 20s and in the first decades of the 21st
centuries. Results of the research were presented in the series of
monographs, many articles and reports.
But before discussing these works, it is
necessary to mention the unique scientific-information publication, which
was begun in 1994, – a quarter review "The European Union: Facts and
Comments". It represents the compressed systematized report of everything
that has taken place in the EU for the last quarter – on all spheres of its
development. It should be taken into consideration that during several
decades in our country it was a real vacuum of information on the European
integration and the EU activity. The above mentioned review was the first
Russian periodic publication supplying the governmental departments,
scientific spheres and the higher school with the regular information and
brief estimations of a situation in the EU.
The study of economic integration in
Europe covers a broad spectrum of problems. From the beginning of 1990s the
main theme of researches became a new stage of the integration – the
creation of economic and currency union (ECU) and the transition to the
unified currency which has received the name "euro". The chief researcher,
doctor of economics Vladimir Shemyatenkov, the first ambassador of our
country to the EU in the past, and the head of the sector, candidate of
economics Olga Butorina are among the most competent Russian experts in the
given field and have obtained a recognition in the West-European scientific
circles. Vladimir Shemyatenkov is the author of the first Russian monograph
on this subject: "Euro: Two Sides of One Medal" (Moscow, 1998). Olga
Butorina has published many articles on problems of ECU and euro both in
domestic magazines and abroad. As a confirmation of high authority of these
experts they got a special grant of the Central bank of the Russian
Federation to prepare the first analytical report on consequences of euro’s
introduction for the currency and external economic policy of Russia. Also
as proposed by the Delegation of the EU in Russia Olga Butorina has
published the book "Euro: What is it?" (Moscow, 1999). The IE is focusing
serious attention on studying some regional problems in the EU, their
interrelation with economic integration that has found their reflection in
scientific works of candidate of economics Irina Busygina and candidate of
economics Natalia Kondratyeva.
In 1990s the need of researching
integration processes in political sphere has sharply increased. It was
caused by growing importance of problems of foreign policy and security,
home affairs and justice in the activity of the EU institutions after the
Maastricht and Amsterdam treaties.
The formation of the integration policy in
the sphere of home affairs and justice is a comparatively new field of
studies. It started developing only in 1990s though the processes
themselves, which lie in the base of these policies, could be noticed at the
first stages of the European integration. It relates, first of all, to
immigration of foreign workers into the countries of the EU that obtained
mass character from the end of 1950s. Terrorism, crime, drug trafficking
have gained the international scale. The agreement, signed by first six EU
members in Luxembourg in a small town Schengen in 1985, postulated
eventually the freedom of movement in growing number of the countries of the
Union and resulted in reinforcement of control on external borders of the
EU. All these factors demand the creation of the appropriate new
legislation. This group of problems became the object of studying not long
ago, and the head of the sector, candidate of economics Olga Potemkina is
one of the leading Russian specialists in this area. She has published
lately a number of fundamental works. The new essential direction of
research is reflected in the publication by the young expert Alexander
Tevdoy-Burmuli "European Nationalism in the Context of European
Integration".
The major component of the modern phase of
European integration is its territorial expansion. In 1995 Austria, Finland
and Sweden became the EU members. The membership of the majority of
countries of Central and the Eastern Europe will become the main and
fundamental new step on this way. First of them will join the EU,
apparently, in 2004-2005. Thus the integration only now goes beyond the
limits the West-European region and becomes the all-European process. One of
the young experts, candidate of economics Svyatoslav Byhovsky is also
engaged in the research on this subject.
One of central themes developed within the
framework of integration research is mutual relations between Russia and the
European Union. For a long time this subject was studied in the Institute by
doctor of economics Boris Pichugin and doctor of economics Yury Borko. Chief
researcher Boris Pichugin, who passed away several years ago, was one of the
most knowledgeable Russian experts in this area. In Yury Borko's works
dynamics of Russia – EU relations is analyzed mainly within the framework of
the Agreement on partnership and cooperation (APÑ),
which was signed by them in June 1994 and entered into force on December 1,
1997.
From numerous scientific publications of
the Institute, which produced 11 monographs and altogether more than 160
books and articles devoted to the European integration, it is worth choosing
two most significant. The first book "Looking into the 21st Century: the
European Union and the Commonwealth of Independent States" is written by a
group of authors including academicians Vitaly Zhurkin and Nicolai Shmelev,
professors Yury Borko, Vladimir Shemyatenkov and others. They put before
themselves the following tasks: to provide a contemporary interpretation of
civilizational and social prerequisites for the European integration; to
investigate the positive and negative factors influencing the dynamics of
the CIS development; to determine possibilities of formation of the
all-European economic space and the new system of security and cooperation
in Europe with full, equal and active participation of Russia.
The theme of fundamental premises of
regional integration is not enough developed in the domestic scientific
literature dedicated to the European integration. Meanwhile the unique
successes and features of the European integration in considerable measure
are conditioned by several factors. All countries, which became members of
the European communities, belong to the same civilization. The same world
religion lies in the basis of their culture. The common societal system was
established in them with similar basic characteristics: market economy,
organized civil society, democratic and a lawful state, advanced system of
social protection. In this sense the states - members of the CIS are more
diverse, though they were a part of united Russian Empire for several
centuries (as a minimum, one and a half centuries). In the opinion of the
authors, intermediate term tasks of the CIS members are not so much economic
integration (so far there are not enough objective and subjective conditions
for this process), but promotion of economic, social and political stability
on the basis of market and democratic transformations and formation of
effective system of security and cooperation in the CIS space.
The second fundamental monograph "The
European Union on the Threshold of 21st Century: Choosing Strategy of
Development ", prepared by the collective of researches from the Institute
with participation of scholars from other academic institutes, edited by
Yury Borko and Olga Butorina, is devoted to analyzing the results of the EU
development in 1990s and its future prospects in the beginning of 21st
century. First of all the process of formation of the economic and currency
union (ECU), which began in 1990 and started its final phase on January 1,
1999, is studied in this work. It contains the forecast of ECU development
and prospects of euro as the EU collective currency. The present condition
and prospects of development of partnership and cooperation between the EU
and Russia are examined. The intermediate term (10-15 years) prognosis of
development of the European economy and processes of the European
integration are presented with the main conclusion that the EU will continue
to move to more consolidated and integrated Europe, but by virtue of
internal and external circumstances the tempo of its progress will be
slower, than in 1980s and 1990s.
The study of the European integration
processes was facilitated by the creation in the Institute in early 1990s on
the initiative of the European Commission of the EU Center of Information
and Documentation. It is operated by researchers Valentina Tyazhelova and
Kseniya Sharapova-Antonova. There are over 30 thousand storage units in it.
Young researchers Nicolai Kaveshnikov and Andrei Motkov successfully work on
problems of integration.
Traditionally most unusual and interesting
results appear at a joint of various sciences, and in one research center –
at a joint of various scientific disciplines. At the joint of integration
studies and analysis of problems of European security an interdisciplinary
research of the EU common foreign policy, security and defence started
actively developing. In 1994 Dmitry Danilov's work "Western Europe after
Maastricht: Evolution of Security Integration" was published. Quite radical
shifts in these areas took place in late 1990s. They facilitated intensive
research. Conceptually these shifts were preceded by series of the EU
summits during 1990s. Practically the radical turn – as it is more and more
recognized now – took place after the French - British summit in a small
French town Saint-Malo at the end of 1998. Germany, Italy and other members
of the EU quickly joined the idea to create collective armed forces of the
European Union, which was advanced at this summit. At the EU summits in
Cologne and Helsinki this idea was given concrete expression, and the
European security and defence policy began to get shaped as one of the
priorities of the Union. Majority of politicians and experts understands
that the implementation of this policy will be a difficult and long process.
Nevertheless, an important (and possibly even historical) turn in this
sphere of integration has taken place.
There was the radical turn to the study of
these problems in the Institute of Europe. In a couple of years a number of
works were published. Among them: "European Union: Foreign Policy, Security,
Defence" (Moscow, 1998) by the author of this publication; "Europe in
Multipolar World" (Moscow, 2000) by a group of authors; "Structurization of
the Security Space in the West and East of Europe" (Moscow, 2000) by the
head of Department of European Security Dmitry Danilov and the head of
sector, candidate of history Arkady Moshes. The research work on this new
direction is becoming more active.
Studies in European security are not
limited to these new phenomena. It was sequentially conducted from the
beginning of the Institute. A proper tribute was paid to the development of
the concept of the common European home, though it existed only in a rather
vague form. Nevertheless the general tendency of our country could be
perceived. It was aimed at completing post-war confrontation and
substituting the structures of bipolar world by a new system of security in
Europe based on principles of equal cooperation. What should be a
configuration of a new Greater Europe uniting former opponents in cold war?
What elements of former system should be eliminated, and what are to be kept
and transformed? What concretely such transformation should consist of and
what should be its orientation in time? What are basic threats to the
European security during postconfrontational period and how may the
consolidated Europe confront these new challenges? There were only some of
major questions, which had been waiting for answers.
The necessity to realize and to launch
(along with basic research) studies of the broad spectrum of concrete
problems of security has resulted in inviting experienced diplomats and
military (Victor Vladimirov, Yury Deryabin, Vladimir Erofeev, Igor
Maksimychev, Eugeny Malashenko, Yury Rubinsky and others). Their
contribution to analytical work of the Institute is significant.
Initially the military-political problems
played an important role in the work of the Institute. One of the first
monographs prepared in the Institute was the work devoted to the role of
tactical nuclear weapons in Europe and prospects of developing control in
this sphere. A lot of attention was paid to studying defence policies in the
countries of Europe, their military-political cooperation and integration,
and after the disintegration of the USSR – to first steps aimed at
construction of their own armed forces undertaken by the countries -
participants of the CIS.
However due to the process of decreasing
confrontation between the USSR (Russia) and the West and reducing the role
of military factors in Europe, accents in the activity of the Institute
began moving toward political-military, political and economic problems of
security. The research on the architecture of European security aimed at
developing the Russian approaches to this process, resulted in a great
number of works on evolution of the European and Euro-Atlantic structures of
security (OSCE etc.) and development of system of collective security in the
CIS. One of the first monographs of the Institute "Security of Future
Europe" (1993) ed. by doctor of history Sergei Karaganov, was devoted to
these problems. Such important direction of studies as research into
regional security and regional cooperation was developing quite
successfully. A growing importance of untraditional, so-called "soft"
challenges to the continental security, which are occupying the increasing
place in the European strategic prognostication, is influencing the security
studies expanding them by inclusion of ecological, migration problems,
interethnic relations, in particular in the post-Soviet countries.
Naturally, the research carried out in the
Institute, by virtue of its orientation at supporting the conceptual base of
the Russian foreign policy, should be conducted in close contact with the
official institutions, which formulate and realize the foreign policy of our
country. The Institute continues to carry on not only the basic research,
but also studies wide range of problems having immediate practical value. It
sends to the interested ministries and departments analytical papers and
reports, carries out "round tables" and situational analyses with
participation of scholars and officials. When invited its members
participate in discussions on problems of practical politics in divisions of
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defence, Security Council, State
Duma etc.
Among priority areas of studies one should
indicate here first of all the analysis of the European security
architecture, ways and forms of its possible transformation; relations
between Russia and the major Western organizations – NATO, WÅU,
EU; problems of enhancing stability and structural organization of security
in Central and Eastern Europe, in the Baltic sea region; contemporary crises
and conflicts both on the west of the continent and on the post-Soviet
space; problems and practice of the international peace-making activity and
Russian participation in it.
Special place in research of present
Russian policies was occupied by the sharpest problems caused by the
expansion of NATO, its aggressive actions in the Balkans, Bosnia and Kosovo
crises.
The authority of experts of the Institute
engaged in problems of the European security is high not only in our
country, but abroad as well. I’d like to bring only one example. The joint
research project of the Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences and
the Institute for Security Studies of Western-European Union (Paris),
devoted to relations between Western Europe and Russia (from our side it was
conducted by Dmitry Danilov), resulted in the publication of "Challiot
Papers", the series widely known all over the world. The joint report,
alongside with official French and English languages, was published in the
language of the third country – Russian for the first time in the history of
"Challiot Papers". The report received a very good response in all major
foreign centers studying problems of international security.
In 2001 in order to widen the research
into aggregated problems of modern Europe the Center of the International
Relations and Foreign Policy Research headed by candidate of history Nadia
Arbatova was created.
Beyond the above-mentioned fields of
research some other interdisciplinary groups of experts emerged in the
Institute, which dealt with common European problems, mostly economic. The
first two of them were established in 1992-1993.
The Center of the International Social and
Economic Comparisons led by Valentin Kudrov was created with the purpose of
realizing regular comparative research of macroeconomic parameters of Russia
and main countries of the EU, the economic reforms in Russia and in the
countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEÅ),
of carrying out constant monitoring of the course of economic development of
the EU countries. Particular attention was paid lately to the prognosis of
basic trends of economic development in Russia and the EU countries until
2015. Under special consideration is comparison of volumes of production,
employment levels and labour productivity between the industry of Russia and
the EU countries. The Institute published monographs "Europe and Russia:
Experience of Economic Transformations", "The Retrospective View of the
Soviet Economy", and other scientific works. It also held the international
conference devoted to an exchange of experience in realization of economic
reforms in Russia and the CEE countries together with the Vienna Institute
of International Economic Comparisons.
The research into economic problems of the
scientific and technical progress (STP) plays an important role in the
activity of the Institute of Europe. It is carried out by the
interdisciplinary group studying STP problems headed by Vadim Tsirenshchikov
in particular in three major areas. Within the framework of the first of
them theoretical and practical aspects of STP’s influence on economic growth
of Western Europe are analyzed. The research has shown, that the basic
stages and types of post-war economic growth of Western Europe completely
coincide with critical points of movement of the fourth and fifth famous
Russian economist Nicolai Kondratiev’s big cycles. The economy of the
Western Europe has passed the period of long stagnation of the big cycle and
enters 21st century in a phase of economic prosperity of the big cycle with
all positive consequences for economic development of the region.
The second direction of this group’s
research is aimed at working out a conceptual apparatus of scientific and
technical integration, the study of main features of internationalization of
production under STP influence, new phenomena in development of science,
engineering, technology as well as an analysis of the EU scientific and
technical politics and its constant monitoring. The third area is covering
proposals and recommendations for domestic practice on the basis of critical
analysis of Western experience in the STP sphere (including some results
obtained during conferences and seminars organized by the group). They were
presented in series of papers and reports directed to the ministries of the
Russian government, Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences and other
interested bodies. The results of research are reflected in many
publications, among them the monographs by Vadim Tsirenshchikov "Scientific
and Technical Integration of Western Europe" (Moscow, 1992) and "The Policy
of Industrial Development of Russia", ed. by candidate of economics Lev
Volodin (Moscow, 1999).
In 1997 by efforts of candidate of
economics Arkady Maslennikov and his colleagues (candidate of economics
Anatoly Bazhan and others) the Center named "Banks and a Credit Policy" was
created. The main aim of the Center is to trace basic processes in banking
and financial spheres in the countries with transitional economy, first of
all in Russia, in a context of internationalization and globalization of
international financial and economic relations. The first large work of this
Center became the extensive report presented to the research structures of
the Bank of Russia and devoted to financial and legal conditions of
introduction of unified currency within the framework of the EU. The report
contained conclusions about consequences of this process for the
international financial positions of Russia and proposals concerning
possible steps by the government and the Central Bank.
In the series of reports of the Institute
several works are also published, in which on the basis of analysis of the
Western Europe experience recommendations were given on re-structuring bank
systems of Russia and on increasing banks’ role in development of real
sector of the Russian economy. The wide set of these problems was analyzed
in Vladimir Shenaev’s monograph "Monetary and Credit System of Russia"
(Moscow, 1998).
In the years of the Center’s activity a
number of dissertations were prepared. Among them there were theses on
international migration of capital, investment policy of Russia and some
West-European countries, on studying international experience in the field
of trade and economics, and currency rate policy of various states of the
world. Researches of the Center regularly act as scientific advisers to some
state and non-state financial organizations.
In 2000 the Center of Problems of Social
Development in Europe was created in the Institute. It is headed by doctor
of history Marina Kargalova, who was for many years involved in social
policy research. She is the author of the monograph "From Social Idea to
Social Integration" (Moscow, 1999).
The Center has organized several
conferences including international ones, and "round tables": "Europe –
Russia. Basic Directions of Social Development in 21st Century", "Enterprise
as a Primary Factor of Economic and Social Development (Experience of EU and
Russia)", "Problems of Intellectual Property in Russia", "Modern Social
Conflicts: Problems of Genesis and Regulation". Some collections of
scientific papers and reports were published as a result of these
conferences. At one of them in 2000 the decision was adopted to create the
Council of Social Research to coordinate research in social area, uniting
efforts of experts, first of all from institutes of the Russian Academy of
Sciences. Academician Nicolai Shmelev was elected the chairman of the board
of this Council; his deputies are Vladimir Shenaev and professor, doctor of
economics Sergei Pronin, deputy director of the Institute of Comparative
Politology, the Russian Academy of Sciences. Marina Kargalova was elected
director general. The Council and the Center present their studies to
committees of State Duma and Council of Federation of Federal Assembly of
the Russian Federation.
The Center on Problems of Religion and a
Society in Europe, created in 1996 on the initiative and under the direction
of doctor of history, professor Anatoly Krasikov, in the beginning looked
rather unusual in the structure of the Institute. But it occupied
successfully its proper place among the structures of the Institute, created
a number of scientific publications, which attracted wide attention.
The Center studies a direct and indirect
influence of religious groups on politics; influence of states and political
formations on believers and their organizations; mutual relations between
religious organizations and followers of various religions and, finally,
interaction and interrelationship of religious and other factors influencing
political stability, international relations and security of Europe and its
integral component – our country.
The Center works in close contact and
cooperation with scientists from other academic institutes, with Russian and
foreign governmental as well as nongovernmental organizations and,
naturally, with leadership of religious bodies. There are lots of seminars,
symposiums and scientific-practical conferences on the account of this
Center.
It is necessary to mention among them
especially the conference "The Interreligious Peace and Accord as a
Condition of the Peaceful Future for Peoples of Northern Caucasus"
(Pyatigorsk, February 1998). The international scientific conference held in
the Institute of Europe in December 2000 with participation of Russian
Orthodox metropolitans and Catholic cardinals "John XXIII and Modern World –
Christian Evidence, Coexistence and Cooperation" received a wide response.
It took place within the framework of actions devoted to the
2000-anniversary of Christianity.
The main results of the research were
presented in Anatoly Krasikov's book "The Religious Factor in the European
and Russian Politics (Historical Aspect)", and in collective monograph
"Religion and Politics on the Threshold of Two Millennia". One of the latest
works of the Center is the monograph "Church and Society. Dialogue of
Russian Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism" published in Russia and France.
Many scholars and religious figures from Russia, France, Italy and USA
participated in its preparation.
The second "wave" of formation of
scientific directions of the Institute, based on a regional-geopolitical
principle, has followed the first "wave" rather quickly. As early as at the
beginning of 1990s two such centers – one devoted to studying the
Mediterranean (later Mediterranean and Black Sea) problems and the other –
for the study of German problems were created in the Institute.
The research on policy and economics of
Germany always occupied one of major places in the activity of the Institute
of Europe. For the Russian academic science Germany is of interest from
various points of view: studying the model of social market economy and
analyzing internal and external political processes in this largest country
of Western Europe. The interest in Germany has increased considerably with
the beginning of the unification process of two German states. For deeper
analysis of German problems in 1989 the Sector of Germany was created, and
the Center of German Studies was formed on this base in the summer of 1992.
Candidate of economics Vladislav Belov heads this Center. His deputy is
candidate of history Victor Rykin, the head of the Sector of German Internal
and Foreign Policy.
Within the framework of this short review
it is impossible to embrace all spheres of the research of German economy
and policy. Lately the following themes became the basic directions of the
analysis: fundamentals of basic economic order; role of macroeconomic
regulation in the formation of optimal market conditions for market
subjects; external and internal political processes (in particular the role
of leading political parties in modern German society); questions of
budgetary federalism and local self-government, first of all, in the area of
mutual relations between the Center and the Federal Lands especially in the
sphere of the mechanism of financial equalization; the Eastern policy (main
attention is devoted to the development of mutual relations with the CEE
countries in new conditions); and, certainly, the Russian-German relations –
especially bilateral economic cooperation and elaboration of recommendations
for its development.
Germanists of the Institute actively
participate in the work of Russian and international conferences where they
present their papers and reports. They themselves organize conferences and
seminars. At the end of the previous decade the Center has carried out a
number of the Russian-German scientific conferences, particular interest was
attracted by the conference devoted to analysis of ten years' result of
transformational processes in East Germany and Russia. In 2000 together with
representatives of the Fridrich Ebert Foundation the Center organized the
Round Table discussion "Modern Social Democracy in Europe: Challenges and
Chances" and the international conference "European Federalism and Russia:
Experience of Past and Present". Major publications of the Center, which
were well accepted by specialists, are: collective monograph "The Social
Market Economy of Germany and Economic Transformation in Russia" (Moscow,
1996), monographs "The Unification of Germany and its Consequences" (Moscow,
1998), "Financial Foundations of Local Self-Government" (Moscow, 1995), "The
Role of Communes in the System of German Statehood" etc. Among the authors
of the above-mentioned works are Vladislav Belov, Victor Rykin as well as
young but already quite experienced germanists: senior researchers –
candidate of economics Kira Baranova and candidate of history Kiril Vyatkin.
The Center has been taking an active part
in Russian and international consulting projects, among which –
participation in German program TRANSFORM (the Russian-German project on
reorganization of a system of management in the sphere of housing and
communal services at the level of enterprises as well as some projects on
improvement of professional skill of Russian managers, including those
within the framework of the Presidential initiative); successful fulfillment
of the World Bank project "Interrelation between financial accumulation by
the population and economic growth"; the joint project with the German side
on studying problems of federation and communes; participation in the
program of the Moscow Government "The Science for Moscow" within the
framework of which the work "Development of methods aimed at increasing
efficiency of the Moscow financial system (studying Berlin experience)" was
prepared.
The Center of German studies plays one
more important role: it unites around itself germanists-economists and
politologists, who continued their work in science, in spite of difficult
conditions. This role is one of priority in the activities of the Center.
A number of the principal works devoted to
German and all-European problems was published by doctor of political
science Igor Maksimychev, among them: "Threats to Security of Russia
Connected with the Beginning of the NATO Expansion (Foreign Policy Aspects)"
(Moscow, 1998), "Continent at the Crossroads. New Russia and New Germany in
New Europe" (Moscow, 1999), "Eastern Policy of United Germany. Results of
the First Decade" (Moscow, 2001).
In 1989 a group of scholars from a number
of academic institutes founded the Council of the Mediterranean Problems
attached to the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences. They
understood that traditions of studying foreign policy of our country and its
participation in international affairs in this region are undeservedly
underestimated, and they should be revived, especially if to take into
account, that the role of Mediterranean in the life of the world community
has greatly increased. The end of cold war allowed to hope, that the region
may become a zone of cooperation and partnership of all states having here
their interests, with Russian participation.
When after several years it became
obvious, that events will develop in another way, and national interests of
Russia appear under threat not only in the Mediterranean, but also in
adjacent Black Sea region, the Council has expanded the sphere of its
activity and started analyzing the Mediterranean-Black Sea area as a whole.
Now in the field of vision of the Council there is also the Caspian Sea,
which has formed together with the Black Sea and the Mediterranean an
extended "arch of vulnerability" on southern borders of Russia.
The Center of the Mediterranean and Black
Sea Problems founded in the Institute of Europe and led by doctor of
history, professor Nicolai Kovalsky, who prematurely passed away in 2001,
became the working body of this Council. This Center and, accordingly, the
Council see their task in exploring new components of vital (national)
Russian interests in this region, analyzing changing conditions, developing
applied decisions and recommendations in the field of Russian foreign policy
activity. The main aim is to assist formation of foreign policy of Russia on
this southern direction, to find out factors, which should be taken into
consideration, to offer optimal ways for realization of this policy.
The collective thought of researches of
the Institute and members of the Council as a whole is expressed in extended
works published as monographs, which attracted attention both in Russia and
abroad. For a number of years books edited by Nicolai Kovalsky received
positive response in the scientific community. Among them "Russia, the
Mediterranean, South Europe" (Moscow, 1995). Some distinctive features of
this work are the width of coverage and analytical elaboration of researched
questions, the non-standard approach to many of them, the balanced estimate
of acute problems. In 1997 in the series "Security of Russia" the book
devoted to the problems of the Black Sea region, to be exact – geopolitical,
economic, social and ecological aspects of regional security, has appeared.
The interrelation between culture and security is considered in it as well.
Some results of studies are published in
English. The book "Russia: The Mediterranean and Black Sea Region" (Moscow,
1996) became the first such publication. The book "Europe, the
Mediterranean. Russia: Perception of Strategies" (Moscow, 1998), created
opportunity to compare various approaches to regional realities and to show
a multipolarity of such estimates. A number of outstanding foreign
scientists and political figures took part in this book. The voluminous work
"Europe and Russia: Problems of the South. The Mediterranean – Black Sea
Region – Caspian Sea" was published in 1999. In this book over 40 Russian
and foreign specialists took part. Among them there were representatives
from academic community as well as officials of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, the Ministry of Economics and other offices of the Russian
Federation.
In 2000-2001 Vitaly Zhurkin and Nicolai
Kovalsky edited several collective monographs: "European Union – Russia:
Balkan Situation", "Plans of Stability for the Caucasus. The West and
Russian Interests", "Globalization and Regionalism: Black Sea Region.
Balkans".
The Center of the Mediterranean – Black
Sea problems during years of its existence carried out a series of Russian
and international conferences, which received good response in our country
and in Europe as a whole. They were followed by the publication of the
above-mentioned collective monographs. In 1998 the Institute together with
the Association of European Studies and the Kuban State University conducted
the European summer school where the new regional organization – the Black
Sea Youth Initiative was founded. For a number of years the Institute of
Europe is represented in the Working group on science and technologies which
is one of the branches of the Organization of the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation – BSEC.
The Council of Mediterranean-Black Sea
problems is governed by the Board (Collegium), which is headed by the author
of this article. Deputies are Nicolai Shmelev, Vladimir Shenaev, professor
Alla Yazkova. Nicolai Kovalsky was the president of this Council from the
time of creation until his passing away. Nadia Arbatova is the
vice-president. Members of the Board are academicians Vladimir Babeshko,
Nicolai Kuznetsov, Alexander Chubaryan, deputy director of the Institute of
Europe and Chairman of the Council on foreign and defence policy Sergei
Karaganov, director of the Foreign Policy Foundation Boris Panov and others.
The member of the Board professor Evgeny Kutovoi became alternate director
general of the International Center for Black Sea Studies in Athens. Now the
Council unites over 60 scientists from institutes of the Russian Academy of
Sciences and other research centers, professors and lecturers of Russian
universities.
Since 1994 a group of researchers of the
Institute is studying problems of relations between Russia and countries of
the CIS, and between the Commonwealth as a whole and Europe. Today it is the
Center of problems of mutual relations between Russia, countries of the CIS
and Europe, headed by doctor of history, professor Dmitry Furman.
On this direction a rather wide spectrum
of studies is formed. It includes the problematics of economy, history,
culturology, science, conflictology etc. Among the most significant works it
is necessary to name the book of the first head of the Center academician
Nicolai Shmelev "Advances and Debts. Yesterday and Tomorrow of the Russian
Economic Reforms" (Moscow, 1996), in which the following perception of
Russia runs all through: Russia should not search for any special "national
idea" because the idea always was with us: idea of creation, development and
innovation of the native land. Dmitry Furman's books are devoted to the
countries of the CIS: "Byelorussia and Russia: Societies and States",
"Ukraine and Russia: Societies and States", "Azerbaijan and Russia:
Societies and States".
In 1999 the Center prepared and issued the
generalizing work "The Post-Soviet States in Europe of XXI Century" in which
an attempt was made to foresee probable social and economic contours of
Russia in the first quarter of the new century, to appraise possibilities of
the adequate answer by the national scientific and technological complex to
challenges of globalization, to juxtapose centrifugal and centripetal
tendencies on the post-Soviet space. In the context of traditional for the
Institute comparative regional studies the head of the Sector of
Ethnopolitical Conflicts candidate of history Pavel Kandel (problems of
conflictology) and doctor of philosophical science
Ålena Vodopyanova (problems of social
history) are analyzing situation in Russia, other countries of the CIS and
CEÅ.
It is worth to emphasize that formation of
the regional-geopolitical centers was dictated not only by scientific needs.
To a large extent it was conditioned by the search of the highly qualified
experts who had to create these centers. When the outstanding Russian
scholar and diplomat, doctor of history, professor Yury Rubinsky, who held
for many years important positions in the Embassy of our country in France,
joined the staff of the Institute in 1997, an opportunity emerged to create
under his leadership the Center of the French Studies, which quickly earned
a fine scientific reputation in Russia, France, and in other countries of
Europe.
The activity of the Center correlates with
the general methodology of research of the Institute. It organically
combines the study of country and regional problematics with the wider
all-European problems in one way or the other relating to Russia. The first
report published in 1997 includes two parts – "Political Changes in France:
Causes and Consequences" (about parliamentary elections which have resulted
in change of the majority in parliament and the new government) and "The
Image of Russia in France". Similar approach, supplemented with the aspect
of international comparisons was adopted in the next report prepared
together with Kiril Vyatkin – "Long-term Joint Programs of Social and
Economic Development of the Center and Regions" (Moscow, 1998).
Yury Rubinsky's two books – "Western
Civilization between Two Millennia" (Moscow, 1999) and "Europe of XXI
Century: State, Political Parties, Civil Society" (Moscow, 2000) are devoted
to the all-European problems. At the same time the number of Yury Rubinsky's
works was issued in France in publications of the French Institute of
International Relations – IFRI (books "France and Russia in Search of
Multipolar World", "Russia and NATO", "Splinters of Empire") and the
International Institute of Geopolitics.
The birth of the Center of Northern Europe
has happened in the same way in 1999. It was brought about when the
well-known Russian diplomat, Ambassador Yury Deryabin joined the Institute.
The systemic studying of modern tendencies and problems of the Northern
Europe, the Baltic and Euro-Arctic regions is carried out within the
framework of this Center. It is conducted in coordination with interests and
requirements of Russia on this traditionally important and dynamically
developing direction. Special attention is devoted to new opportunities and
forms of cooperation of Russia and its regions with other countries and
their regions, and also with the international, regional and subregional
organizations and structures, including European Union, Council of Baltic
Sea States, Barents Euro-Arctic Council, Arctic Council. The Center is
preparing analytical materials and publications and working out proposals
and recommendations for the formation of policy and practical actions of
Russia in the above-mentioned regions. In 2000 the Center completed
analytical-practical reports "Northern Dimension" of the European Union’s
Policy and Interests of Russia" and the other – on regional organizations of
Northern Europe. The senior researcher, candidate of economics Natalia
Antushina investigates a special Scandinavian model of social and economic
development.
In 2000 the complex of the
regional-geopolitical centers was completed by the creation of the long
planned Center for British Studies led by the young Russian scientist, Ph.D.
in politics (candidate) Alexey Gromyko who quickly developed the research
and organizational work.
Soon after the creation of the Institute
of Europe mutually advantageous long-term cooperation on the European
problems was established with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian
Federation. In order to achieve more effective utilization of the results of
the Institute’s research by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs situational
analyses and other meetings were held in the Institute of Europe with
participation of representatives of the Ministry’s departments. An extensive
exchange of information-analytical materials is carried out between both
these organizations. These materials cover a wide range of European and
general international problems, in particular, those which cover mutual
relations of the states of Europe with Russia as well as positions of these
states on various problems.
The coordinators of cooperation are the
deputy director of the Department of General Secretary Andrey Nesterenko
representing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and
the head of the Country Information Desk Alexandr Bochever representing the
Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
In modern Europe information plays a
growing role in all spheres of life of a society. In the Department of
Informatics of the Institute of Europe (the head – candidate of technical
sciences Vladimir Mashlykin) the theme "Prospects of All-European
Information Space" is being developed for a number of years. This theme
became important in conditions of modern "postindustrial" or "information"
society on the threshold of XX and XXI centuries. For the Institute of
Europe spheres of development and use of computer science methods are above
all international relations, comparative economy, problems of security and
social life of the European countries. In the process of developing the
general concept of European information space (ÅIS)
in the department the following problems are being solved:
First, the quantitative analysis and
creation of automated databases (ADB) on the European themes, which are
contained and saved in computer memory. These bases contain bibliographic,
factual, full-text and reference files on political, economic, social and
other problems, personnel of scientists-europeanists, the regional
geographic and legal information, data on activity of the State Duma. The
databases of the Institute of Europe, being one of the elements of Russia’s
state information resources, are registered in the structure of the general
official Register of the Ministry on Communication and Informatization of
the Russian Federation. Their basic open part is accessible to users by
means of the global information network Internet.
Second, the development of the specialized
linguistics of classifiers and multilingual thesauruses on the European
themes. Fast and effective ADB search is possible only on the basis of these
linguistic means – the specialized machine all-European language. In the
Institute this work is conducted in cooperation with the parliamentary
library of Federal Assembly of Russia and with some scientific centers of
major European countries.
Third, the participation in development
and practical activities of some international information systems:
"European Information Network on International Relations and Area Studies"
(EINIRAS), "International Security Network" (ISN) etc. Participants of these
systems organize regular international conferences, sessions of task groups
and meetings. The Center of the automated network on the European problems,
connected with major countries of Europe, operates in the structure of the
Department of Informatics.
The results of this work find their
reflection in the international working documentation and scientific
publications. In 1999 Vladimir Mashlykin's generalizing monograph "European
Information Space" was published. In this publication all formations of the
European information space (EIS), including the Russian information space as
one of the basic components, are analyzed.
The information resource of the Institute
is supported by the library with about 9 thousand volumes (responsible:
Natalia Pavlovskaya, Galina Chechetkina), a number of accesses to Internet,
complexes of e-mail (Maria Slesarenko) and facsimile communication
(Valentina Lipkina).
Soon after the creation of the Institute
of Europe an important problem arose – how to create the interrelation of
fundamental and applied European studies with the system of higher and
whenever possible secondary education in Russia; how to create the
constantly functioning complex of interaction between the Institute and key
Russian educational institutions, first of all universities. This task had
also the second principal side – the necessity to extend communications with
education and science beyond the bounds of Moscow, into other regions of
Russia.
This problem was solved by the creation of
the Association of European Studies (ÀES)
registered in 1992 (executive director – candidate of history Olga
Potemkina) on the basis of the Institute of Europe. Since 1994 AES is one of
ñî-founders of the international union
of associations of European studies (ECSA - World). A number of academic and
educational bodies became co-founders of AES: institutes of the Russian
Academy of Sciences, major Moscow educational institutions, individual
members from the same communities as well.
It is especially important that 25 Russian
universities1
participate in the work of the Association in various forms (in particular
by creating AES branches).
AES regularly conducts seminars,
conferences, symposiums. It is very significant because they help to
establish numerous contacts with colleagues, to carry out a fruitful
exchange of opinions and information, and also to put into practice
multilateral joint studies of important problems of Europe and relations
between Russia and the European countries.
AES conducts an active teaching and
educational work, it is another very prominent dimension of its activity.
Not only researchers of the Institute of Europe but leading scholars from
other academic and educational centers of Russia as well as foreign experts
participate in conducting courses at universities of our country.
The effective new form of such activity
are organized since 1998 by AES "European schools" for students,
post-graduates and school pupils, which are carried out together with
regional universities. Summer or winter schools were held in Nizhny
Novgorod, Ekaterinburg, Arzamas, Krasnodar, Lipetsk, Petrozavodsk,
Ioshkar-Ola and other cities. The Center of integrational studies and
programs (St. Petersburg), which is a collective member of AES, organizes
each year international schools in Repino. Annual series of lectures for
schoolchildren of Moscow "Modern Europe" are carried out since 1997 together
with Association "Youth Euroclubs".
On the threshold of the new century, when
the new director academician Nicolai Shmelev was elected, the Institute of
Europe has found a new breath. "The third wave" began in its life and
activity. It was marked by new endeavors and new initiatives in various
spheres of scientific work.
A new fundamental monograph edited by
Nicolai Shmelev occupies a special place among annual 10-15 books issued by
the Institute: "Europe Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow". It sums up all multiyear
research activity. In this work practically the whole research community of
the Institute participated. The multifaceted substance of the book, the
thorough analysis of the political, economic, social and other evolutional
processes taking place on the "Old continent" in the end of XX – beginning
of XXI centuries, strong prognostic emphasis and many other virtues make
this monograph the largest creation of the Institute of Europe. This book
does not only summarize more than ten years' research activity, but also
represents reliable base for the further scientific search.
New structures, already mentioned above,
are created in the Institute. New highly professional researchers joined it.
Among them it is necessary to single out the outstanding economist, former
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Corresponding
Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ivan Ivanov and well-known
germanist, former Deputy Minister of Economics of the Russian Federation,
Vice-President of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs,
doctor of economics, professor Valentin Fedorov.
In 2000 the publication of the academic
organ of the Institute – quarterly journal "Contemporary Europe"
(chief-editor Nicolai Shmelev, executive editor Yury Molchanov) – started at
long last. It quickly got a very positive recognition in Russian and not
only Russian academic and public circles.
The series of published individual and
collective works "Reports of the Institute of Europe" substituted for
journal during almost ten years since 1993. 75 such reports were issued
until the start of 2001. However they could not replace completely such
necessary periodical as the journal.
From the very first issues the journal
offered to readers a number of deep and original articles on fundamental
problems of Europe, Russia, Russian-European and as a whole contemporary
international relations2.
The publication of the journal has been demanding constant efforts of almost
all academic community of the Institute of Europe.
Now the regular staff of the Institute is
109 persons. The successfully working postgraduate course, which has
advanced many young experts (head – Galina Pavlinskaya), includes today over
20 young people.
In addition to the basic Academic Council
in the Institute of Europe there are two specialized Academic Councils for
defending dissertations to get scientific degrees of the doctor and the
candidate (PhD) of economics, history and political science, which are
actively functioning.
The Institute is in touch with over 70
research academic and educational centers in the near and far abroad.
Candidate of history Evgeny Mironenkov, who worked for long time as deputy
director of the Institute, heads this important direction of its activity.
The managing structure of the Institute is
at present as following: the director – academician Nicolai Shmelev, the
author of these article – director emeritus, the following deputy directors:
corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ivan Ivanov,
corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Vladimir Shenaev,
doctor of history Sergei Karaganov, doctor of economics, professor Valentin
Fedorov, Vladilen Puhov, the scientific secretary, candidate of economics
Lev Volodin.
The average age of the scientific staff of
the Institute is 44 years.
Summing up, one may say that the Institute
of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences has confidently joined the
family of the interdisciplinary academic institutes studying major regions
of our planet. Together with them it experiences well-known difficulties
which are endured in the transitional period by our science. Together with
them it searches for new ways of work in new conditions. With optimism,
though quite guarded the collective of the Institute of Europe is looking
forward into the future.
Translated from academic journal “Novaia i
Noveishaia Istoria” (“Modern and Contemporary History”), Moscow,
¹ 6, November – December 2001.
Zhurkin Vitaly Vladimirovich
– academician, director emeritus of the IE of the Russian Academy of
Sciences.
In the article reference and analytical
materials were used, prepared by the following authors: Vladislav Belov,
Yury Borko, Alexander Bochever, Elena Vodopyanova, Dmitry Danilov, Yury
Deryabin, Nicolai Kovalsky, Anatoly Krasikov, Valentin Kudrov, Arkady
Maslennikov, Vladimir Mashlykin, Galina Pavlinskaya, Olga Potemkina, Yury
Rubinsky, Dmitry Furman, Vadim Tsirenshchikov.
1 Altay, Pomorsk (Arkhangelsk), Vladimir
pedagogical, Volgograd, Voronezh, Ural (Ekaterinburg), Ivanovo, Petrozavodsk,
Kemerovo, Kuban (Krasnodar), Lipetsk pedagogical, Mari, Moscow, Nizhniy
Novgorod, Perm, Rostov, St.-Petersburg, Saratov, Stavropol, Tver, Tomsk,
Tyumen, Ulyanovsk, Chelyabinsk, Yaroslavl state universities.
2 In the first
issue the following articles were published: Gorbachev
Ì. Europe in the 21st Century: Unity
– Logarithm of Success; Shenaev V., Shmelev N. Russia and the
European Union – Problems of Economic Partnership; Shishkov Y. Europe
and the Economic Globalization Problems; Rubinsky Y. European
Civilization at the Threshold of III Millenium; Krasikov
À. Christian World. Problems of
Dialogue. In the second issue: Ivanov I. Clear up the Ways for
Strategic Partnership; Bahr E. (Germany). Europe between Protectorate
and Self-Determination; Kandel P. The West and Russia in the Russian
Public Opinion; Danilov D. Russia and the Greater Europe: Security
Strategy; Deryabin Y. "Northern Dimension" and Russia’s Interests;
Reiter E. (Austria). Idea of European Federation; Kudrov V.
Europe in the World Economy. In the third issue: Konstantinos
Stephanopoulos (President of Greece). Strengthening Ties of Friendship;
Fedorov V. Russia at the End of XX Century; Culmi D. (France).
European Defence-Building; Bazhan A. Restructuring the Russian
Banking System. In the fourth issue: Avdeev A. European Vector in the
Foreign Policy of Russia; Steuber E. (Germany). Federalism in Europe:
Bavarian Point of View; Morozov G. The Millenium Summit and the UN;
Gromyko Al. Century of British Labour; Vodopyanova E. European
Feminism: Ideas and the Movement: In the first issue of 2001: Akayev
À. (Kirghizia). New Understanding of
Euro-Asian Conception; Manfred Shtolpe (Germany). Brandenburg Invites
to Cooperation; Arbatov À. Main
Problems of Military Reform; "Federalism in Europe and Russia: Experience of
Past and Present" (International Conference).
|